Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Sinister Children's Books, Part 2

From a book of old nursery rhymes.
The words and illustrations speak for themselves.



"Mommy, will you read me a bedtime story?"
"Of course, my darling innocent child. Let's read the one about murdering a Robin while a voyeuristic Fly watches and a Fish catches his blood on a platter!"
"Yaaaaaaayyyy!!!!!"
Sweet dreams.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Sinister Children's Books


While visiting friends recently, I got sucked into the wonderful vortex of reading stories to their nearly-2-year-old daughter. We read this book a lot. A whole lot.
 
 
At about the 4th (or 40th) read-through, a realization began to dawn on me. I'm not sure if I'm cynical or the book is secretly sinister, or both. I should let you read it for yourself so you can form your own opinion before I weigh in, though:



 
 Okay, sorry, I know I promised to let you read it independently. But I have to cut in here. Why are all these predators inviting the sweet edible forest animals to a party?! WHAT KIND OF "PARTY" IS THIS?!  It's like when a python invites a mouse to come cuddle. It's like when I smile tenderly at a Chipotle burrito and invite it home with me for dinner. 
 
Read on:
 
 
 
At this point, I started to think, "Aww. Maybe I was wrong. It's just a sweet little book about all the forest animals living in peace and harmony. After all, in these 3 scenes, the vulnerable succulent prey animals are the ones inviting the carnivores to the party."
 
But then on the final page, I realized:
  

Everybody's got an angle. The bear, fox, badger, owl, and hawk are all just aiming to gather as many edible targets as they possibly can in one place. The beaver, skunk, squirrel, and conniving little rabbit are all just hoping the predators will eat that defenseless baby deer instead.

Moral: Children's books get exponentially more disturbing the more you think about them. So read to your children, but read on autopilot!

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Biomagnification

I met my friend Jeremy in med school, back when he and I were both the type of people who sit in the center of the front row, studiously taking notes, marinating in all the glorious nerdery.
Jeremy loves grammar. He despises poor punctuation. Where most of us have bad dreams about failure and monsters and our own untimely demise, I believe typos and inadequate syntax may actually be what haunts Jeremy's nightmares.

One day, I came across a meme and sent it to him. He liked it so much, he made it the backdrop on his computer:

A few weeks later, he left his laptop unattended during a break between lectures, so I hacked in, did a bit of Photoshop mischief, and replaced his desktop with this while he wasn't looking:

The break ended. Lectures resumed.
Minutes passed.
Hours passed.
Days went by.
I wondered if he would ever notice the switch.
The following week, suddenly in the middle of a class he looked at his desktop as though seeing it for the first time and physically recoiled in horror and disgust. It still cracks me up to think about that moment. Simply beautiful, really.

I'm currently stuck at home with pinkeye. Since I can't go anywhere for fear of contagion, the only rational approach to the situation has been to sit on the couch with a box of tissues, wiping my goopy eye and watching my favorite movies. Follow me on a tangential train of thought triggered by the movie marathon:
Watching My Fair Lady got me thinking about language and grammar, which reminded me of Jeremy, but in the larger scheme of things it made me think about the way speech patterns get entrained and passed along from generation to generation.

A parent with atrocious grammar passes it along by example to the child, who then grows up to be a parent with atrocious grammar who passes it along to the child, etc.

But!...
 - it goes beyond mere grammar. Beliefs and behaviors function this way, too.
 - it doesn't just operate at the low end of the socioeconomic spectrum. A fascinating study found that the more expensive the car, the less likely its driver is to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. It's not hard to envision how a parent who is too self-important to bother stopping the BMW for a mere pedestrian passes that self-importance along by example to the child, who then grows up to be a parent too self-important to bother stopping the BMW for a mere pedestrian, etc.
 - I'd be willing to bet it magnifies from one generation to the next, because we tend to partner with people similar to ourselves. (An elitist marries an elitist, they insulate themselves from anything and anyone they consider beneath them, so their children get an even more concentrated version of their elitist example.  ...and/or they inherit hemophilia.)
Gasp!  Clutch your pearls!  Who let in the commoner?!
In a way, the amplification of traits from one generation to the next reminds me of the conservation ecology phenomena of bioaccumulation and biomagnification.  Take the pesticide DDT, for example. It's got a 15 year half life so it hangs out in the environment a long time, and it's fat-soluble so it goes straight into tissue storage instead of being excreted back out after an animal ingests it. Thus, over time, a bottom-feeder accumulates a lot of stored DDT in its body (bioaccumulation).

Then, a fish eats a bunch of those bottom-feeders and all that ingested DDT gets stored in the fish (biomagnification).


A bird of prey eats several of those DDT-loaded fish over time, ultimately ending up with a whopping load of DDT (further biomagnification), which causes the bird's eggs to have thin, calcium-deficient shells that break before the chicks have a chance to hatch, thereby endangering the bird species.


My point in this bio-geek tangent:  Eventually, like DDT, if it goes unchecked by parents and external points of reference, so much ego has accumulated in the family lineage that they inevitably produce offspring who are oblivious to the realities most people face, and a disappointment to the human species in general.
 
With that, I think we finally have a biological explanation for how this happened:

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Awkward Phase

Have you ever been new at something?  New to a job, new to a hobby, new to parenthood, new to driving, new to pet ownership -- doesn't matter; just new at something. 
When you're brand spankin' new, everything's exciting. Every step is a first step, and if that step is wobbly we all understand that it's just part of being new.

 
But then, oh then, a little time passes and you reach the inevitable awkward phase.
 
Not new anymore.
Not adorable anymore.
Not exciting anymore.
But clearly not full-fledged yet.
Gangly and weird, still making mistakes
     but without the galvanized excuse of Newness.
Struggling through the Halfway-There-ness,
     wishing you could just skip ahead to There instead. 
 

Here's to dreaming of someday: